History

DIFFERING VIEWS OF MANUFACTURINGThe two accounts provide radically different views of manufacturing in Britain during the 1830s , when the industrial Revolution was very such(prenominal) underway . While Andrew Ure s memorandum is praise-heavy and acknowledges no negative aspects at all (other than criticism of patience , the House of Commons interrogative sentence offers a first-hand account of gloomy , grinding , and even dreadful conditions child stabers facedSource 22 .1 , Extolling the Virtues of the shaper is an 1835 report intended as an answer to critics claims that constancy has had abusive effects on British society . However , its reference (Andrew Ure merely avoids the criticisms and drowns them out with empyrean praise . Ure asserts that manufacturing has non only generated considerable wealth for Britain , nevertheless also that it has brought the resources of war [and] well-provided subsistence for the population (p . 374 .

In slimly overblown prose , Ure adds that British labor has even benefitted the world at large and quickly dismisses labor s critics whose specific accusations he does non discussUre argues that , for example , weavers in steam-driven poser mill are not overworked rather , he says , the fool force [of steam power] leaves the listener nearly nothing to do at all (p . 374 ) and that mills provide a rosy-cheeked workplace . He sidesteps the issues of factory-related illnesses , desire working hours , and poor discussion of workers , instead shifting the whang onto the worker s poor provender and the dampness of his hovel (p . 374 in essence , he blames workers for in some way opting for...If you desire to get a estimable essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper